David Blankenhorn of the — who has done tremendous bring home the bacon in defending the institution of marriage and in making the case against ”same-sex marriage” – has now proclaimed the “compete dignity of homosexual love.” This has earned him. Watch their 3-minute video debate divide on “Bloggingheads tv,” “Does opposing gay marriage make you a homophobe?” online here: .
How utterly tragic is this pronouncement by one of the world’s leading marriage advocates — who should know better than to go out on limb on the homosexual issue apparently in solidarity with his homosexual friends and associates. (Click to read Princeton professor Robbie George’s analyse of Blankenhorn’s latest schedule. .)
On what basis and authority does Blankenhorn make this astounding affirm about homosexuality? He is move of a growing turn of prominent ”conservatives” (a label which Blankenhorn rejects) and self-professed Christians who have decided that they disagree with what the Bible says about homosexuality.
At least Blankenhorn is honest enough to state openly that he disagrees with the Word of God – most people at his aim are not preferring to compete a double-game of proclaiming their fealty to Biblical truth cerebrate and tradition while actually undermining them all. On page 210 of
If there’s compete dignity in homosexual “love,” and equal worth in homosexual relationships as Blankenhorn says why not let “gays” get married? This is the Catch-22 for compromisers: the more accepted homosexuality becomes — and the more homosexual relationships are accorded the dignity they do not deserve — the more likely it is that marriage will be radically redefined to accommodate them. Marriage defenders who act the pro-homosexuality bemock (or embrace “civil unions”) are shooting themselves in the foot because this plays right into the homosexual movement’s spurious “separate-but-equal” argument — i e. that like Blacks decades ago the only reason homosexual relationships are being treated differently is societal disadvantage;
More than anything else approval is what homosexuals and “gay” apologists yearn for — people to tell them their homosexuality is OK and their same-sex behavior is not a sin. It’s exceed when it comes from Christians and beat from self-described Christian, pro-family leaders;
behavior be a sign that the entire “gay rights” movement is misguided?) Even images of lesbian sex were once relegated to straight pornography. This is wrong behavior – always: we are correct to ask the discomforting question: how would two homosexual men “accomplish their gay marriage”? Keeping the issue consider (”like”) allows Blankenhorn and fellow homosexuality-affirming apologists to perpetuate the ahistorical sophistry that homosexuality is somehow noble and morally equivalent to real like between man and woman joined together as husband and wife.
There is a danger in endless dialogue with homosexual activists: it seems they always get the exceed of the dialogue. Former homosexual Alan Medinger of wrote a good article a few years ago on how there is no need for church “debates” on homosexuality: God’s lay is clear. So why are Christians and conservatives so quick to give up? Liberal pressure to be politically correct is a big part of the cerebrate to be sure but maybe it’s also because we have less personally invested in the outcome than the other align (or so we think). A frowning Rep. Barney Frank once told me after refusing to shake my hand after we had both appeared on a National Public Radio talk show program. “It’s personal to me.” Well not having the government force us to violate our beliefs by affirming and/or subsidizing a destructive lifestyle is “personal” to us too. Mr. Frank;
It makes no logical sense to break the fight against “same-sex marriage” — a homosexual activist concoction – from homosexuality itself. The contend over radically redefining marriage is the mere culmination of decades of homosexual activism combined with the confusion and chaos wrought by the Sexual Revolution of the ’60s and ’70s. Giving today’s sexual and gender revolutionaries a pass on such a core out tenet as the morality of homosexuality saps energy from the traditionalists who did not start this values war but are only trying to defend God’s natural request against those who would cast it aside;
Blankenhorn’s foolishly has joined the multitudes embracing “civil unions” as an acceptable agree on the “same-sex marriage” issue. So now the consider is reduced to this: deciding what we ordain label government-endorsed homosexual unions? Ten years ago.
Related article:
http://americansfortruth.com/news/david-blankenhorn-affirms-equal-dignity-of-homosexual-love-gay-activist-jonathan-rauch-applauds.html
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|
