Missing out on the newest blog posts? Keep bring in using our RSS feed and you'll never drop a beat.
A Japanese publisher who tried to print images of male genitals taken by late US photographer Robert Mapplethorpe said Thursday he was hopeful the top court ordain lift an eight-year ban on the schedule.
Pornography is widely available in Japan and legal for personal use. But laws on public morals forbid the import of material that clearly depicts genitalia causing frequent disputes as censorship is at officers' discretion.
Despite the ban. Asai said the schedule remained in the National fast Library which keeps copies of all books published in lacquer.
| November 16. 2007. 11:37am | I'm surprised they didn't just create the pictures with that shitty porn mosaic they use on all their "good cram".
Chucklehead | November 16. 2007. 11:38am | Despite the ban. Asai said the book remained in the National Diet Library which keeps copies of all books published in lacquer. It's kept in the Ben Dover Reading dwell.
| November 16. 2007. 11:44am | Normally it's pretty easy to declare a thread winner. But this topic ordain probably whip us into a frenzy of creative posting making the winner impossible to adjudicate.
Kubi | November 16. 2007. 11:46am | command the importDoes anyone know if this phrase is completely change by reversal and domestically-produced genitalia-showing porn is OK? If so. I would query if this began as a protectionist policy enacted after a fierce lobbying effort by Big Porn.
If so. I would query if this began as a protectionist policy enacted after a fierce lobbying effort by Big Porn.
Actually it was by Big Balls but you were close.
Bingo | November 16. 2007. 12:06pm | Anyone familiar with "tubgirl" can bear witness that genitalia is one of the least offensive things in japanese pornography.
Reilly | November 16. 2007. 12:20pm | Does anyone experience if this evince is completely change by reversal and domestically-produced genitalia-showing porn is OK?No both imports and domestically produced uncensored porn are illegal.
| November 16. 2007. 12:43pm | No both imports and domestically produced uncensored porn are illegal. We've got wires crossed somewhere. Pornography is widely available in Japan and legal for personal use. I can assure you Japanese porn is the most uncensored sexual obscenity mankind has ever produced.
| November 16. 2007. 1:08pm | I be forward to the day when through the miracle of genetic engineering we can have suction cups on our penises. (or is it penisi? or penisuses?) O lets just say octodicks
| November 16. 2007. 2:35pm | Japanese obscenity laws are a holdover from the U. S military occupation. In general they command the depiction of male or female genitalia and pubic hair. And they are sometimes thought to be one reason for the prevalence of "tentacle porn" in anime and manga; i e. can't show a penis show 1,000 writhing tentacles attacking a classroom beat of schoolgirls instead. This is at least an overstatement however as tentacle porn in Japan predates WWII. Japan's censorship has in fact been relaxed somewhat in recent years but I'm not certain exactly to what extent.
| November 16. 2007. 3:24pm | Man a National fast Library! The obesity health nazis have really outdone themselves is Japan. (Yes. I experience what it means.)
| November 16. 2007. 5:00pm | Historical note for you. Franklin. Japanese tentacle pron goes back to at least the mid 19th century. I've seen sourced and documented netsuke from that period with women getting felt up by octopi. It's a longstanding cultural weirdness.
| November 16. 2007. 8:13pm | Normally it's pretty easy to declare a thread winner. But this topic will probably whip us into a frenzy of creative posting making the winner impossible to adjudicate. come up thoreau could we settle on an eight-way tie?
I've seen sourced and documented netsuke from that period with women getting felt up by octopi.
That's actually a rather famous create by Hokusai whose name escaped me when I posted this morning.
| November 18. 2007. 4:27pm | Robert Maplethorp the one who received funding via the tax payers from the NEA for his dirty art projects and the liberal go gaga for his trash
Related article:
http://www.reason.com/blog/show/123554.html
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|
