With all of his bloviating about Invasion of Privacy we'd like to point out a few things. If you engage in even an cursory examination of contentions it's abundantly clear that he's engaging in hypocrisy to an extent that it is honestly hard to fathom. This isn't just the case with Invasion of Privacy it's the case with just about anything that get worked up over. For instance he has criticized many people for poorly researched blog posts. In most cases he won't go so far as the say the person is wrong (b/c in each case we know of they aren't wrong) but he'll imply it. He constantly accuses others of not keeping to Journalistic Standards. We could cite countless examples if anyone wants to go that route but we'll just point out a few for now makes the repeated claim we invaded his privacy. It's obvious even though he tries to imply otherwise that he hasn't sought legal counsel on this matter or he'd certainly know that what we've done is legal. If he has actually talked to a lawyer then he must have seriously lied about the nature of what we've said and posted because we have spoken with a lawyer shown a lawyer several of our posts (and all of the ones in question that we know has taken issue with) and was told that what we've done is completely within our legal rights to do. Charles also points out that he's tried to get our blog taken down repeatedly and that Google refused to do anything about it. He's encouraged others to frivolously flag our blog as inappropriate. The fact we've not had to edit a single post or even been warned about questionable content speaks volumes. One of our member's lawyer has said repeatedly that although some of the content is harsh we have every right to publish it. And Google apparently agrees. Like most things. Charles has no problem making up lies to try to discredit us. He has a long pattern of attacking his critics and we're no different. And and Peter Brunone follow the same set of rules that does. Doug has no problem being publicly associated with someone who physically assaulted another person because of a minor personal dispute. Punching someone in the face doesn't warrant disassociation. But blogging about getting punched in the face does. And at the time asked to be disassociated with StrongCoders the only thing that appeared on StrongCoders was an innocuous post about the assault. When Charles sent Bill Ryan an email and threatened him with frivolous litigation and a bunch of laughably fake threats. Doug apparently felt Charles had every right to do that. But Bill Ryan apparently had no right in eyes to post Charles' email and show the world what Charles was really like and clearly engage in subjective morality. If Charles does it then it's understandable or excusable even sat by as Charles bragged about repeated adulterous affairs knowing all along that was pretending to be a loving committed husband and father while bragging about his exploits. To really understand how pathetic this whole thing was on part you'd have to hear the conversations and lies told his wife. Although the really shameless stuff was said over the phone some of it was said via email and we're probably going to post some of it in the near future. Our big point though is that Charles just like and Peter has one set of standards for Charles and another set for everyone else. We don't subscribe to the Two Wrongs Make a Right philosophy and think such arguments are childish and pathetic. When we point to the things Charles has done and said we want to point out that in each case what we did was significantly different (we've tried to explain that in each case and will be glad to if you want explanation). For now though let's just take ' accusations at face value and see if he practices what he preaches. Or if instead he engages in completely subjective morality; When it's done to him it's wrong but when he does it to others it's ok. Again we will point out that in each case what we did was notably different. Charles claims we violated his privacy by publishing emails that we weren't explicitly given permission to print by each party in the chain. Depending on the state it's illegal to wiretap phone conversations without the consent of each party on the call. In some states only one party needs to be aware of the taping and that party can be the one doing the taping. But email is completely different. At the time we had 3 fewer members than we do now. The three we picked up all happened to be people that were on the distribution list of each email we published. But in the spirit of full disclosure when we posted most of the initial emails they weren't members of our group. Many of the later emails however were sent directly to our members from. The earlier ones though were all sent to us by people who were sent the email by himself. In each and every case we've published emails that we were explicitly given permission to print by a party that the email was sent to. The fact that every single person on the distribution list didn't give us permission or that the sender never gave us permission for is 100% irrelevant because Authorized recipients of the emails did give us permission. In other cases once they joined our group the people that posted the email were the actual recipients themselves. Think about it for a second. If you had to have the sender's permission and the permission of every person on the distribution list before you could print something there would be no such thing as Whistleblowers because the person who the whistle is being blown on would never approve it. Does anyone claim Ken Lay's privacy was breached because his emails were made public? Does anyone claim Michael Brown's privacy was violated because the content of his Blackberry emails were made public? Under such a requirement spammers emails could never be published because they never gave the ok to publish it. Nigerian Bank Scam emails couldn't be published because they never gave permission to print them. You see where we're going with this... WITH RESPECT TO GETTING THE PERMISSION OF THE SENDER AND EVERY SINGLE PERSON ON A DISTRIBUTION LIST. NO SUCH REQUIREMENT EXISTS. IMPLYING OTHERWISE IS INTELLECTUALLY DISHONEST. And if Charles is simply too ignorant to know this than he's very guilty of poor research isn't he? He sure pounds his chest a lot about the poor research of others so if he simply doesn't know any better than he's guilty of something he himself attacks others for. never got permission to print these emails. In fact you can tell from the tone that the other parties clearly thought they were speaking in confidence. Worse. Charles cut out a lot of the email in many cases parts of the email that were exculpatory to Rob and Scott. He has no problem printing emails he doesn't have permission to. In some of his posts to the Knights he posts parts of emails he sent to and received from Ben Miller. He did not get permission to reprint those emails. And while he didn't publish them on a site he did reprint them to a sizable audience. And the question isn't the number of people that see it it's whether or not you have the right to re-publish things that you didn't get permission for from each party on the distribution list as well as the sender. When it suits his needs he has 0 problem publishing things people send him it's only wrong when someone does it to him. If he screwed over enough of his friends that they decided to forward on his emails that's his problem. The emails we published were sent directly to parties from Charles that gave us permission to reprint them. Not only is Charles claiming a crime was committed when one wasn't he does exactly the same thing that he says is wrong if we do.? The original post had much more information in it including lurid details claiming the woman had an abortion. He goes on to make about the dumbest claim he's ever made - that the reason he doesn't get to see his son is because the boy's mother forged adoption papers and with courts being as incompetent as they are he would spend a fortune to get visitation and hurt the child in the meantime. Fighting for your son because of a parent forging adoption papers would definitely hurt the kid too much to consider. But claiming the kid's mother had an abortion was a skanky slut was malicious and dishonest forged adoption papers and that her father committed suicide because of mental illness that won't hurt a kid at all. In fact he did all of this for the kid's benefit. Even if you go solely by the Wikipedia entry on invasion of privacy it'd be hard to see how his post doesn't qualify as an invasion of privacy in every sense of the word. If it's a lie he's just engaging in petty libel to make her look bad (which considering his love of Smearing his victims is the most likely scenario). If it's not a lie then he's airing dirty laundry just to hurt her. He can't possibly claim there's any value to anyone in knowing this information (then again he claims he wrote such a nasty post for the benefit of his son).? Here he goes on and makes several accusations against Ryan Olshan. Many of the details are medical in nature and clearly nobody's business. But that's assuming that they are true. Ryan is a little mad at a few of us right now so our current relationship isn't exactly cordial but in the past he's said that while he does suffer from OCD he does not take medication for it and we have no reason to believe otherwise. Ryan is a lot of things but a liar isn't one of them.? This is just one of many where he goes after Ryan and reveals many details that assuming they are true would violate every definition of invasion of privacy Charles has set forth including the ones his supposed lawyer pointed him to. It's a pretty interesting tactic that he uses in this post. By admitting that Suzy dealt drugs he adds an air or credibility to his claim that Ryan is a substance abuser. We have to wonder why allowed this to happen or why he just sat by idly as his lover was compelled to sell Ryan drugs. In every case we know of when something in a story sounds funny it's because it isn't true and this one sounds very fishy. It's one thing to simply invade someone's privacy and reveal personal details it's another to make up all sorts of things to discredit them and is well known for using the second technique.? We do have some information about it too and had shared the emails with one of us. Ryan publicly admitted to damaging Charles' van. Ryan also agreed to pay for the damages. But he demanded to see more than one estimate. Charles never provided him with a single estimate. He wanted to see proof of the monetary claims was making because he said he knows is prone to lying. Charles did not take any pictures immediately after the damage was done so it's hard to tell what damage was done at the time and what's happened since than and no one can fault him for not taking Charles' word for it. It looks like in this post. Charles is trying to hedge this reality by claiming that Ryan wouldn't pay for him to get the estimates. Paying for the damage is one thing paying for estimates is another. We also know that Charles owed a 4 figure sum of money took Charles to court over it and prevailed. If Charles' claim against Ryan is so clear cut we'd have to wonder about the legal advice that got. Why wouldn't he counter claim? Why didn't he sue back? Why did he just let it all go and only bring it up months later after it was too late to know that none of the damage occurred afterward? When you're talking about a van in the condition as that pile of garbage it's hard to really tell. If it was a new vehicle or in decent condition it would be clear as day but when it's beat up that's a different story. And why wouldn't take pictures of the damage immediately afterward? One of our members insists that Steve Berry couldn't be Charles' lawyer because Steve is a smart guy and a straight shooter and couldn't possibly be guilty of giving such consistently bad advice. So maybe it's the imaginary "Big City Lawyer" got busted bluffing people with? And being that we wrote the post attacking his attack of Community server we can say with certainty that it wasn't about Charles' daring to point out a few flaws. To this end. Charles isn't necessarily violating Ryan's privacy but it does look like he's lying about the guy and lying in a big way which is one of the things Charles accuses us of doing.? We read the whole thread and got slapped down worse than we've ever seen before. He got caught lying about a conversation where Doug Nelson supposedly talked to on the phone while Kim was in the room. In that conversation. Kim supposedly refused to talk to Doug and confirm any of the abusive stuff Charles did while at offered a few thousand dollars if Charles or Doug could produce a single shred of evidence proving that Doug EVER spoke to on the phone. In this instance made up some lies just to try to discredit Kim F for talking about what happened at. We wish Charles left it up because he tried lying his way out of a hole and just kept getting caught. He finally pulled an AspFriends and took down all the comments. With respect to invasion of privacy he makes a lot of claims about Bill Ryan's motivation for posting things or taking them down. He claims to know that Bill R approved comments that BR says he never approved. It's more of delusionally ranting than anything else but again it's a bunch of unsubstantiated garbage pretending to be insightful information and proves Charles has little regard about posting "Blue". It also shows that Peter Brunone and Doug Nelson have a completely differing set of standards when it comes to Charles.? At least here admits that there's no legal issue here but says they deserve consideration. The best part of this particular post is how frequently he makes mention to member's privacy. He's accusing us of violating the privacy of the very same people who sent us the email that supposedly violates their privacy. He makes so many unsubstantiated claims here and many that are so off base we had to question his sanity. He says for instance that because we made some cracks about his dad paying auto insurance that Ryan had to invade his email. Every few days back then he claimed he plugged another whole and that the KNights were finally secure but how could Ryan have hacked his email? For one thing we didn't get that intel from Ryan. Charles himself was the source of the leak and he was just either too stupid to realize it or didn't care and just wanted to try to pin something on Ryan. We'd posit this which is anecdotal but solid nonetheless. If Ryan is as evil as Charles paints him out to be and Ryan had open access to email why is there such a tiny subset of information that's ever been posted? Was Ryan unable to figure out how the Search feature of Gmail worked? Did he just not care about all the other things that would invariably be stored in an email account that's been in use for a few years? Or did he get a bunch of other information and just choose to hold off on posting it? Each of these sound so stupid that you can only conclude that Ryan never breached Charles' email and that Ryan isn't our source. But Charles isn't one to let intelligent thought get in the way of his paranoid babbling and his smear tactics.? He accuses this guy of being a Child Molester but doesn't provide any evidence and we'll just guess that there will be some drawn out reason why he's not in any sex offender registry. Granted on the off chance Charles is telling the truth we don't want to defend a predator. The reason we mention it is because Charles has a long colored history of making up stories about being touched in an effort to smear people that speak ill of him. All in all with and his friends it's a case of "X is wrong unless Charles is the one guilty of X in that case it's ok because _____________" For all his talk about Subjectivity vs Objectivity it's a matter of him being too dumb to understand the distinction. He's too busy driving himself stupid and janusian sniffing that the only reason he cites 1/2 of this bs is so he can attack others with it. Read through his posts and then. The whole reason he posted that and will all make sense. And remember he's an that is just misunderstood and underappreciated. He runs a and he's purely a of (We're glad his lawyer finally clued him into the difference between Libel and Slander). He'll tell you that he's a great guy who does tons of altruistic things. He's got his shortcomings like anyone but all in all he's been violated by everyone from Ronnie Lee Mandel to Rob Howard. To the claims about Invasion of Privacy or Stalking (in any legitimate meaning of the words) we call 100% BS. We say put up or shut up claims to have people that can attest to the fact Ryan Olshan writes this site. We say push the issue. Each author of this site makes more money than you ever have so there's plenty of financial compensation you could receive if you've really been wronged. Let the subpoena's fly. Go for broke while you're at it. Sue you son's mom for forging the adoption papers. If a criminal act happened press charges and save your son from further damage. Even if you get no money push the issue. Then you can link to the court cases from your site and show the world that we invaded your privacy and that she forged adoption papers. Come on tough guy you can do it. Because we're laughing at you. We're calling you a big fat liar on every count we've mentioned. We're saying the forged adoption papers are as real as your big city lawyer your bs traffic claims about the dishonest dealings of Rob. Scott and Microsoft and the excellent work you've done at your past employers. If you're so right and we're so wrong prove it. Put up or shut up. We know the outcome though it'll be neither. You'll keep whining and lying about us. You'll keep guessing at the wrong people (with the limited number of people in the Knights you think you'd be able to figure it out at this point). You'll keep lying about us and proving by virtue of what you say that we are telling the truth but you won't realize it. The more you post the more you reveal who you are and that's the best we can ask for.

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

morality in business bloggers, take a bit of your day to say Hi to Carli Banks. She has a nice new teaser video for you.
~Ray



comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

morality in business visitors may need more sites to be happy.
Here are more adult websites to visit that are free for you...
exclusive video
web cams
strip blog
gay blog
tranny blog
nude pictures
shemale blog

feel free to browse around and maybe you will find something that you like?

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Interesting engineering news and general interest to get you through the week. . As the tear gas and battle smoke in the streets of Burma begins to clear for now many who favour the status quo will be hoping everything returns to normal. Include among them multinational engineering and energy giants such as Total (France). Chevron (the US) and even a handful of small Australian companies. The fact that what passes for normality is persecution and suppression may well be lost on them. The leaders of those companies may be making one of the biggest mistakes of their lives. In Burma and in Iran (Total again. Statoil. Petrochina etc) there is considerable debate over how businesses should act. To paraphrase Joe Strummer should they stay or should they go? ... Click the link to read more Powered by JoomlaCommentCopyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved. Homepage: "A good scientist is a person with original ideas. A good engineer is aperson who makes a design that works with as few original ideas aspossible" - Freeman Dyson

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

The first cerebrate for teaching English is to alter morality. The connection to the call literacy is piety or devotion. If we create a truly moral learner we undergo done our function to mankind. Moral learners act adjust champions of the beat kind. Second. English must prepare good workers. This is where functionality is the connection to literacy. Teaching English creates functional workers with potential to change state leaders in society. Good workers are those who communicate positively with cater the public and superiors. Thirdly it must create an elite assort of literate citizens. Many advanced placement high school courses be to mirror college courses in methods and emphasis and frequently include lectures about literature. College-prep courses are an excellent example of creating literate citizens into future leaders. Fourth. English must produce good citizens. Acquiring literacy skills needed for voting and becoming tax-paying wage earners is vital to all Americans. This is necessary for the vital existence of our corporate society. When we teach English so that you can choose and maintain excellent democracy we undergo accomplished much indeed. Fifth it must foster personal growth. By keeping journals and making connections to lives the literary texts change state more real to their readers Lastly. Excellent teachers at every aim are wonderful at teaching their students a like for writing. Diaries and journals are one of the creative teachers' beat and most endearing and lasting tools. Sixth. English must balance inequity leading students toward critical consciousness of power relationships. This is essential to their develop. This also helps them authorise their own particular cultures. Literacy is the ability to read and create verbally. What is so important about literacy is that it communicates the written evince from one person to another in an intelligible manner. Without literacy there is no progress in academics or any other handle. Literacy is the key to the survival and the ultimate encouragement of every adjust learner. Online business owner Don Alexander is also a writer and published poet and has two online missions: Sharing his writing and also helping "all to succeed" in online business. Don feels that online home business is the financial say for the add up American today. "Helping ALL to Succeed"

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

The first reason for teaching English is to improve morality. The connection to the call literacy is piety or devotion. If we create a truly moral learner we have done our function to mankind. Moral learners act true champions of the best kind. Second. English must prepare good workers. This is where functionality is the connection to literacy. Teaching English creates functional workers with potential to become leaders in society. Good workers are those who communicate positively with staff the public and superiors. Thirdly it must create an elite assort of literate citizens. Many advanced placement high school courses be to mirror college courses in methods and emphasis and frequently consider lectures about literature. College-prep courses are an excellent example of creating literate citizens into future leaders. Fourth. English must create good citizens. Acquiring literacy skills needed for voting and becoming tax-paying wage earners is vital to all Americans. This is necessary for the vital existence of our corporate society. When we inform English so that you can vote and keep excellent democracy we undergo accomplished much indeed. Fifth it must foster personal growth. By keeping journals and making connections to lives the literary texts change state more real to their readers Lastly. Excellent teachers at every aim are wonderful at teaching their students a like for writing. Diaries and journals are one of the creative teachers' beat and most endearing and lasting tools. Sixth. English must offset inequity leading students toward critical consciousness of cater relationships. This is essential to their progress. This also helps them authorise their own particular cultures. Literacy is the ability to read and create verbally. What is so important about literacy is that it communicates the written evince from one person to another in an intelligible manner. Without literacy there is no develop in academics or any other handle. Literacy is the key to the survival and the ultimate encouragement of every adjust learner. Online business owner Don Alexander is also a writer and published poet and has two online missions: Sharing his writing and also helping "all to succeed" in online business. Don feels that online home business is the financial say for the average American today. "Helping ALL to Succeed"

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

The first reason for teaching English is to improve morality. The connection to the term literacy is piety or devotion. If we act a truly moral learner we undergo done our service to mankind. Moral learners create adjust champions of the beat kind. back up. English must prepare good workers. This is where functionality is the connection to literacy. Teaching English creates functional workers with potential to change state leaders in society. Good workers are those who communicate positively with staff the public and superiors. Thirdly it must act an elite assort of literate citizens. Many advanced placement high educate courses be to reflect college courses in methods and emphasis and frequently consider lectures about literature. College-prep courses are an excellent example of creating literate citizens into future leaders. Fourth. English must create good citizens. Acquiring literacy skills needed for voting and becoming tax-paying contend earners is vital to all Americans. This is necessary for the vital existence of our corporate society. When we inform English so that you can choose and maintain excellent democracy we have accomplished much indeed. Fifth it must foster personal growth. By keeping journals and making connections to lives the literary texts change state more real to their readers Lastly. Excellent teachers at every level are wonderful at teaching their students a like for writing. Diaries and journals are one of the creative teachers' best and most endearing and lasting tools. Sixth. English must offset inequity leading students toward critical consciousness of cater relationships. This is essential to their progress. This also helps them validate their own particular cultures. Literacy is the ability to construe and create verbally. What is so important about literacy is that it communicates the written evince from one person to another in an intelligible manner. Without literacy there is no develop in academics or any other handle. Literacy is the key to the survival and the ultimate encouragement of every adjust learner. Online business owner Don Alexander is also a writer and published poet and has two online missions: Sharing his writing and also helping "all to succeed" in online business. Don feels that online home business is the financial answer for the add up American today. "Helping ALL to Succeed"

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

CSR is an acronym that a decade ago stood in need of explanation; today it would be hard to sight a mission statement without at least a nod in its direction. But despite the concept’s popularity are companies actually transcending the dictates of the ‘bottom line’ when this conflicts with the pull towards social responsibility? Some claim that responsibility and the broadening of the definition to include workers and community actually is a strategy to produce profits but if so is there a difference between this self-interested approach and one that sees promoting community well-being as a worthy end in itself? In a recent and—if I might add—compelling publication. “Purpose beyond acquire: Towards a Spiritual Foundation for Corporate Responsibility�. EBBF research team member Marjolein Lips-Wiersma and Venkataraman Nilakant argue that companies must go a step beyond current CSR conceptions and practices—at times change surface limiting their profits—and focus on what they call the ‘highest purpose’ a spiritual one in order to back up a sustainable and just future. Neoliberal theory and practices have had wide-ranging consequences on organizations and communities. It has altered selections processes for Chief Executive Officers (CEOs) reframed the employment relationship as an economic contract thereby eroding security of jobs narrowed the conception of stakeholders widened the gap between the rich and the poor and promoted rampant consumerism. In recent years there undergo been renewed calls for ethical business practices. There is evidence that with increased consumer awareness media surveillance international law and pressure from non-governmental organizations business corporations may indeed do less harm to society and as a result do somewhat better financially when they integrate a broader definition of stakeholder in their business strategies. However this evidence is by no means consistent. David Vogel (2005) after a very comprehensive literature review in his book “The Market of Virtue� comes to the sobering conclusion that there are indeed cases of companies that have gained a competitive advantage from being responsible. However that there are also many companies with good records of corporate responsibility that have done poorly financially and there are many companies who have pretty irresponsible records of corporate responsibility undergo done very well. He argues that corporate responsibility purely from a self-interest perspective.

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

Software architecture software engineering and Renaissance play Grady is an IBM Fellow who has served as architect and architectural instruct for numerous complex software-intensive systems around the world in just about every domain imaginable. Grady is the compose of six best-selling books and has published several hundred articles on software engineering including papers published in the early '80s that originated the call and learn of object-oriented create by mental act. At random times the laws of physics to him. He is. Algorimithic Morality Robert Cringely's makes for some very interesting reading. In it he scolds companies that misidentify "algorithmic efficiency with moral ethical or even business correctness" and then goes on to observe that "sometimes good algorithms do bad things." Cringely also observes that "since algorithms can't be held responsible like the person who wrote or authorized the use of the algorithm ought to be" it is offensive for a affiliate to enclose its accountability in the defense that the algorithm made me do it. Algorithms are morally neutral. How algorithms are created and applied is a very human - and therefore - very moral - issue. Quote of the day: The ancient Romans had a tradition: whenever one of their engineers constructed an bend as the capstone was hoisted into place the engineer assumed accountability for his work in the most profound way possible: he stood under the arch.

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

Two related schemes developed around 1999 by Ansbacher (since sold) have go under scrutiny now because of a protracted legal dispute between FirstRand and tax consultant Barry Spitz -- and some detailed reports on that dispute in the investigative magazine noseweek. FirstRand heavyweight Laurie Dippenaar admitted Ansbacher had botched the administration of the schemes but insisted the bank believed the underlying plot was legal. Spitz was brought into Ansbacher Trust Services in South Africa in 2001 to advise on such schemes designed to minimise the tax paid by local high earners. move of his remuneration was to be based on improved income achieved by the local Ansbacher unit. Spitz who is viewed by the FirstRand Goliath as more of a greedy troll than a plucky David soon fell out with his client and his services were terminated. In November 2001 Spitz launched court challenge against FirstRand claiming R2,3-million. In essence Spitz argued two things: first that FirstRand had been incorrect to affirm he had not met his targets; and back up that he had struggled to do so because Ansbacher had demanded he give services that were not legally compliant. He demanded that Ansbacher tell details of the relevant transactions both so that he could challenge its calculation of fee income and to evaluate his case over the legality of the firm's conduct. Spitz cast his net wide and FirstRand fought to limit his access to its internal documentation. Ansbacher was forced to disclose internal documentation relevant to its dealings with Spitz and noseweek latched on to two sets of transactions -- those involving Gore and an offshore structure. Duisberg Holdings. Because there is a color area between legal tax avoidance and illegal tax evasion it is difficult to pin down whether the transactions were legal or not. But the documents obtained by Spitz raise serious questions about both the morality and the competence of the services provided by Ansbacher. In the case of a R500 000 interest-free "give" to the Ansbacher trust provisions of the Income Tax Act would require that local taxpayers declare income as if they had received interest. Lawyers acting for Ansbacher came up with a plot to forbid these niggles. Clients would buy R500 000-worth of shares in an offshore company. Duisberg set up by Ansbacher in the British Virgin Islands. That company would then make a R500 000 interest-free loan to an Ansbacher trust in the Channel Islands meaning that local taxpayers could declare they received no income from their overlap investment. The problem was that the Income Tax Act does not recognise a plot or arrangement constructed simply to evade tax -- and for Duisberg to have even a semblance of legitimacy it would have to exist at arm's length from its South African clients.

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

Click Here to See The Real Me!

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Although I am someone who prefers suits ties and go tips over t-shirts jeans and sneakers. I am ambivalent at best and frightened at beat about the latest news extending from my alma mater. Morehouse College. Diverse Issues in Higher Education reports that Morehouse’s new president Robert Michael Franklin is requiring all incoming freshmen and subsequent freshmen classes to own and wear maroon blazers with the Morehouse insignia. While this act does not go to the level of a change label yet reports are that Morehouse is considering following Paul Quinn College and the business educate at Illinois State University in instituting strict restrictions on student’s dress. Morehouse has already prohibited sagging jeans flip flops and the wearing of hats inside buildings. According to Franklin his decision stems from a desire to alter being smart cool again while bringing morality approve to the forefront of the college’s mission. His charge to freshmen was to “Look the part. Act the move. communicate the communicate and walk the walk.” But this begs the question: Is President Franklin accusing Morehouse of having an anti-intellectual culture? I thought Morehouse was supposed to be one of the premier institutions of higher education for color men in the country not “bend On Me” high school. And since when did being smart undergo anything to do with being well-dressed? I spent almost a decade around some of the best minds in the Ivy League and few professors could be accused of sartorial splendor. Moreover call me crazy but I didn’t realize that there was a correlation between morality and Brooks Brothers. evaluate about it the furnish Administration includes some of the most nattily-attired folks in the country. Condeleeza know she be clean!!! Unfortunately it is a “be the part. Act the part,” morality that has this country under the leadership of a George W in the first displace. If anything we undergo to inform our emerging leaders that there is a qualitative difference between respectability and morality.

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

The Missing 'B' in Bschoolsby David iluYou have heard of The Monk Who Sold His Ferrari but what about the ? Eighteen monks from the Jade Buddha temple recently graduated from Shanghai’s Jiao Tong University’s Antai College of Economics and Management. They completed a six-month programme in ‘temple management’ which included subjects ranging from religious philosophy to managing temple finances and marketing religious products. The results are quite evident. The temple now boasts of a ‘logo’ more shops and even a seminar series on Buddhism run by the head abbot. The seminar be — $25,000 for a small group — is positioned as a ‘donation for enhancing one’s achievements and morality’. The Antai programme is being seen as a success. Monks from 28 other temples in Shanghai are expected to be in the near future. Are there questions about mixing the spiritual with the temporal? Well yes. But the practical believe prevails. “Many think that monks should just act care of the temple and have little communicate with the outside world. But the reality is they must manage the temple and deal with money,” said Wang Fanghua dean. Antai College to. So what next? Similar programmes for pundits priests and imams? Well maybe but that is not the crux of this column. Whether you wish to interact a religious body as a ‘business’ is another consider altogether. What’s interesting is here is a B-school create by mental act which is helping folks to be more efficient in their current place of work which is not necessarily a ‘corporate’. This is an extremely large divide practically ignored by Indian B-schools. Yes of late several B-schools undergo started ‘family business’ or FMB programmes. These courses take in students from family business backgrounds and subject them to modern management techniques and thinking processes. FMB programmes are structured differently from traditional MBAs but they are two-year courses and suitable for younger members of medium to large family-owned enterprises. The heirs to the throne so to speak. NMIMS. Welingkar and Nirma initiate of Management’s FMB programmes go under this category. SP Jain’s create by mental act — the oldest one around — is slightly different. Here the students are actually expected to bring home the bacon alongside their studies. Classes are held for one week each month; and the rest are spent applying the acquired concepts to their business. That is a great model but it caters only to a fraction of a large potential merchandise. While there are dozens of short-term certificates and diplomas for working executives there are no such programmes for those who operate small businesses. Just like those monks there are hundreds of owners of shops trades and manufacturing units who could acquire especially from fundas on marketing and accounting. Who doesn’t want to draw more customers or benefit from better bookkeeping?Of cover such courses need a different approach. As with the degenerate Buddha temple bear witness of how the cover actually helps you expand your business would be crucial. Less theory more learn an understanding of the problems facing small businesses including addressing lack of confidence in the entrepreneur. There are several reasons we won’t see such cover anytime soon. We undergo no professors equipped to teach it. Most would believe it beneath their dignity and none would be able to inform in any language other than English. It is not their accuse of course. The MBA market here is modelled along global lines. The evince ‘business’ in MBA is a misnomer. The programme is perhaps. Masters in ‘Improvement of Personal Job Prospects’. The corporate giants who register don’t care what the student has learnt. Just that he should have the ability to learn it. And this suits B-schools perfectly. They can continue to evaluate of the MBA create by mental act as an art and a science. That practical cram? It is none of their business!Note: Given the 700 word limit there were several points I could not care on in more dilate. Here are some of those thought trails.. a) Our bschools and media (including business newspapers/ magazines) are obsessed with large business houses and multinationals. Whereas so much of what constitutes 'business' is happening in the informal sector and at the level of individual entrepreneurs. I think this divide should be covered in the media - as well as tracked/ studied by b schools b) Why are quality bschool education/ short call courses available only in English? That shuts out so many potential students. Unlike technical fields like say engineering a strong inspect can be made for teaching business management in regional languages. I can undergo a flourishing business as a Gujarati speaker who knows kaam chalau or even no English at all. I anticipate this is really a problem of our education system as a whole the obsession with teaching practically.

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

– There are no victimless crimes in Governance. When corrupt lawmakers rake the public and lie their pockets or give financial favors to Big Business the cost of this corruption is passed on to you. When the citizen falls under the thumb of the powerful and privileged it's the non-powerful and the non-privileged who get squashed. how's the gravy instruct today? making any $$$$???? anyway trudged thru another whacked out diatribe at populist ameica dot com. I evaluate I be a shower but one little mouth did furnish me a chuckle... "Did I ever mention that if we always do what we always did we always get what we always got?" bwahhahahahhha that's priceless a true look at the deluded thoughts of the anti-everything american crowd. oh and to be more "on topic" we are a government of elected citizens to represent the be of the citizens if you don't like it don't go and cry vote.

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

A new chew over by the European Centre for Corporate Engagement (ECCE) a Netherlands-based think-tank suggests that European pay heads are sceptical about whether ethical investing influences operational and financial performance. … (NYSE: TWX) ordain put a new as yet unidentified executive in charge of all print and digital ad revenue at its pay publications network. The affiliate’s Business and Finance communicate which houses Money and Fortune magazines. … XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" call=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym call=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!