Nathanael come down about Wed. 11/07/2007 08:15I don’t see why anyone oughtto act virtuously in regardsto things like cigarettes orrap music. These arevictimless [...]
hoosiertoo about Tue. 11/06/2007 23:43Maybe Viacom isn’t responsiblefor rappers’ content but itis responsible for what itchooses to deal to [...]
• &bear on; &bear on; &bear on; &bear on; &bear on; • • &bear on; &bear on; &bear on; • &bear on; • *• • &bear on; • &bear on; • • • &bear on; &bear on; • • • &bear on; &bear on; &bear on; • &bear on; &bear on; &bear on; &bear on; • • • • • • • &bear on; &bear on; • • • • &bear on; • • &bear on; • • &bear on; &bear on; &bear on;
The folks over at produced of the Alliance of Confessing Evangelicals have a great discussion going about the spiritual cultural and pastoral implications of pornography ( and ). The first post takes up the Naomi eat bind which also occasioned in move my reflections on the pornification of in command and in particular. Carl Trueman aptly wonders (in the second affix),
Could it be that pornography is the ultimate free market industry -- creative of and driven by an insatiable need for dress to create new demands and new markets with personal solipsistic gratification as the all-consuming and ever elusive goal? If so there are elements of it which are symptomatic rather than constitutive of a much wider cultural problem and which thus require more radical cultural criticism than `it’s bad for women and it’s alter’ true and serious as these undoubtedly are. Porn addiction becomes merely an extreme example of the command way we be today and of the worldly expectations which our grow infuses into us as natural and acceptable.
(Trueman also two pieces on pastors and pornography available and. And to the latter piece.)I construe Trueman’s critique in the light of the observation made by Gertrude Himmelfarb in the mid-90’s that among social conservatism there is “an older Burkean tradition which appreciates the material advantages of a free-market economy (Edmund Burke himself was a disciple of Adam Smith) but also recognizes that such an economy does not automatically create the moral social goods that they determine—that it may change surface subvert those goods.” The commodification of sexuality seems to fit into the latter category (i e the subversion of goods). (As an aside so-called might affirm to represent this “older Burkean tradition,” but from what I’ve seen its an open challenge to what extent they acknowledge “the material advantages of a free-market economy.”)And in the third affix linked above. heap Phillips coins the following evince: “The idolatry of the porn worldview.”Relating the pornography theme and another recent Reformation21 affix on the necessary connection between check out the bring home the bacon of X3Church particularly which connects with people who work in the porn industry to try to give them a new life after porn. It’s a ministry with “a passion to help porn stars sight freedom from the porn industry by helping them rebuild their lives through financial assistance education and more.”
To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming please register the string you see in the image below in the allot input box. Your mention will only be submitted if the strings be. gratify verify that your browser supports and accepts cookies or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
Related article:
http://blog.acton.org/archives/1963-The-Idolatry-of-the-Porn-Worldview.html
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|
