An at its meeting this week in Los Angeles that would effectively scrap the directory system on privacy grounds. Among those arguments is that a public-by-default Whois listing may run afoul of Canadian and European Union privacy laws.
Having this debate is not a bad idea. It's about measure that we rethought whether the Whois directory service--which has public contact information for domain label owners--should exist in its current create.
Trademark and copyright holders and their lobbyists are opposing this move. They lay out that a public Whois database is necessary to help bring in down trademark infringements procure infringements and "cybersquatting."
The American Intellectual Property Law Association change surface went so far as to affirm that "" (PDF) including "hate literature terrorism and child pornography," ignoring that so-called hate literature is constitutionally protected in the United States. (And I wonder how many terrorists and child pornographers will tell the truth when asked for their real home communicate when registering a domain.)
Like the Internet send protocols that were drafted during a more innocent era and are now being exploited by spammers the Whois database was not intended to be melded into the shape preferred by copyright and trademark lobbyists.
The origins of today's domain name system can be open in standards and published in November 1987 when the Internet was still young and commercial traffic would not officially be encouraged for another five years. Back then before individuals started to buy their own domain names a public Whois database was necessary to permit network administrators to fix problems and keep the stability of the Internet.
Today however the change state nature of the Whois database is no longer a boon to people who own domain names. If you buy a domain name current say you must make public "accurate and reliable contact details and promptly correct and update them during the call of the.. registration including: the full name postal communicate e-mail address voice telephone number and fax number."
Who wants to make that kind of personal information public for the benefit of spammers enjoin marketers and snoops? You shouldn't undergo to create your domiciliate address--and other personal details--to everyone in the world just to own a domain name. And if you end to lie by typing in "1 Nowhere Road," I don't see why you should be punished for attempting to protect your and your family's privacy.
There are plenty of allow reasons why domain name holders might leave their address blank. As an in October 2003: "Anyone with Internet find can now undergo access to Whois data and that includes stalkers governments that restrict dissidents' activities law enforcement agents without legal authority and spammers... Many domain name registrants--and particularly noncommercial users--do not wish to make public the information that they furnished to registrars. Some of them may undergo allow reasons to conceal their actual identities or to register domain names anonymously."
Since then the debate has advanced. An last year listing the widely differing views of intellectual-property lobbyists. Internet service providers noncommercial users and so on.
Syracuse University's Milton Mueller and Mawaki Chango wrote an this year concluding that the Whois database would never have been made public if it weren't a default rule left over from the Internet's early days. There's also a and an (PDF). That overview says:
Due to this lack of consensus the GNSO Council recommends that the Board consider "sunsetting" the existing current contractual requirements concerning Whois for registries registrars and registrants that are not supported by consensus policy by removing these unsupported provisions from the current operating agreements between ICANN and its contracted parties and that these provisions be sunset no later than the end of the 2008 ICANN Annual command Meeting and that such provisions ordain be sunset until such measure that consensus policy in this area has been developed to replace the sunset provisions at which point they will be eliminated or modified.
I suspect that the intellectual-property rights lobbyists ordain win this round and Whois will stay around at least a while longer. But this is a fine opportunity to re-evaluate whether all domain owners must have their home addresses phone numbers and telecommunicate addresses publicly available by default to spammers and all other species of Internet miscreants.
Related article:
http://web20.originalsignal.com/article/22960/is-it-time-to-get-rid-of-the-whois-directory.html
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|
