CityArthur Rimbaud I am an ephemeral and a not too discontented citizen of a metropolis considered modern because all known comprehend has been avoided in the furnishings and the exterior of the houses as well as in the lay out of the city. Here you would find no analyse of any monument of superstition. Morals and language are reduced to their simplest expression at last! These millions of populate who do not even experience each other care education business and old age so similarly that the course of their lives must be several times less long than that which a mad statistics finds for the peoples of the Continent. Moreover while from my window I see new specters rolling through the thick and eternal city smoke—our woodland shade our pass night!—new Eumenides in lie of my cottage which is my country and all my heart since everything here resembles it,--Death without tears our diligent daughter and servant a desperate like and a petty Crime call in the mud of the street.
Arthur Rimbaud. Democracy in New Directions (Louise Varèse trans.) reprinted in Baudelaire. Rimbaud. Verlaine: Selected Verse and Prose Poems 224 (Joseph M. Bernstein ed.. Secaucus. NJ: Citadel touch. 1947). Like Rimbaud we are all citizens not too discontented of a metropolis considered modern—up to date! We have absorbed all tastes in request to avoid any other than a comprehend for absorption homogenization simplicity and cerebrate. We are all so nice! We are so sensitive! And it is on that basis that modern democracy operates so successfully—as countless numbers of individuals perform participation by voting. And change surface more are invited to overlap their views with each other—and through those organs of metropolitan living in which suitably absorbed homogenized simplified and rationalized they might contribute to the formation and elaboration of suitably metropolitan ideas. And thus processed thought becomes conventional—and the foundation of a reality that is eventually confirmed—in one or another approved create—by an approving electorate. Voting is the maddest of modern statistics. Ideas and their confirmation—the twin specters of modern political life processed and performed through an institutional matrix that ensures that all tastes are accounted for and none show. The collective constructs and then approves itself. These insights were a great help in parsing through the superlative efforts of our betters to cause the rest of us out of our collective torpor and to political challenge the fruits of which ordain be manifested in the performance of affirmation through voting. I refer of course to that news and entertainment magazine published in New York City and circulated nationally as move of the Sunday edition of a large be of newspapers in the United States—walk the Sunday Newspaper Magazine (http://www parade com). In the November 18. 2007 edition. Michael Scherer is called upon to tell the electorate (other than those who are already well represented in this context) that they have the power. Michael Scherer. You have the cater. (Nov. 18. 2007) at 6-7 (part of that week’s “easy tech command leitmotif—“How Technology Can Help You Get Connected”—Easy Tech command”). Scherer starts with the essential—and essentially dynamic—linkage between technology democratic expression and voting. “In this new Internet age democracy means more than a move to the polls.” Id. at 6. Political expression can’t be new in this country something else is: “Every day at personal computers across the nation populate are speaking back to their politicians—posting essays and videos that ordain be seen by thousands organizing their neighbors and delving deep into the issues they care about on their own terms.” Id. Aaah. What is new is the computer—a method of communication both more remote and more insistent than prior methods of democratic participation by democracy’s least common denominator—the people. And more potent it seems. “As more voters get involved politicians are responding.” Id. Politicians are scheduling meeting and race stops at out of the way places choosing campaign songs and running television advertising based on Internet communications. Internet polls and Internet based campaign footage created by supporters. Id. Somehow we are told this has the effect of “flipping the candidate centered conventional wisdom on its head” by allowing people to use candidate web sites as the cerebrate of political expression centered on the candidate whose site is accessed (id. at 6-7) and in the case of Barack Obama for creating profiles on the place he maintains. Id. at 7. Yet what appears as inversion to Mr. Scherer might be more accurately described heightening the concentration on candidate in a new communications environment. We are told that a person has begun to cozen for the candidate of his choice (Barack Obama) on that candidate’s web place that other candidates (Hillary Clinton) now more effectively uses a “large web following with more than 140,000 friends on the popular social networking site MySpace.” Id. at 7. Indeed in the new means of electronic communications politicians do not appear to have supporters any more—they undergo friends. Even the Republican presidential candidates are said to have many such friends though berated for being less energetic in the contest for electronic friendships (“The four leading GOP candidates undergo about 90,000 MySpace friends combined; John McCain leads with fewer than 39,000” Id.). But these friends are worth having. They undergo become a significant source of finance raising. A supporter who raised about $85,000 was quoted as saying. “It’s very easy. Every week I get e-mail from somebody saying. ‘I be to join the network.’” Id. But this is “little donor” collections—harvesting this pool of funds requires a substantial be of outreach. Yet that is precisely what the Internet serves up beat—a low cost way of reaching out both to willing communities of followers (the new virtual communities of friends) and to the uninitiated by methods that might in another age undergo required tremendous resources (mail telecommunicate face to face) but now require only the techniques of spamming. The relationship remains vertical and the framework remains centered on the politicians and the political classes. But homogenization for the perfection of allot outreach and the selection of a appropriately blended political product requires more than candidates it requires the develop of virtual political communities as well. In these communities people serve as large cerebrate groups for the education of candidates bent on more effectively molding their lay. More importantly they answer as the techniques through which raw opinion can be input considered remade and blended into an acceptable collective expression. This collective processed product then serves as the express of the populate to be amplified by the media class—people like Mr. Scherer who might as a result have to work less hard and less sure footedly to sight and popularize the thinking of the populate. As Scherer notes: “virtual political communities have sprung up through sites desire the liberal DailyKos com and the conservative Redstate com where hundreds of thousands.
Related article:
http://lcbackerblog.blogspot.com/2007/11/democracy-part-iii.html
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|
