When considering that pathological eating disorders and their related diseases now afflict more populate globally than malnutrition some experts in the medical handle are presently purporting that the worlds be one health problem is no longer heart disease or cancer but obesity. According to the World Health Organization (June. 2005) obesity has reached epidemic proportions globally with more than 1 billion adults overweight - at least 300 million of them clinically obese - and is a major contributor to the global burden of chronic disease and disability. Often coexisting in developing countries with under-nutrition obesity is a complex condition with serious social and psychological dimensions affecting virtually all ages and socioeconomic groups. The U. S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (June. 2005) reports that during the past 20 years obesity among adults has risen significantly in the United States. The latest data from the National bear on for Health Statistics show that 30 percent of U. S adults 20 years of age and older - over 60 million people - are obese. This increase is not limited to adults. The percentage of young people who are overweight has more than tripled since 1980. Among children and teens aged 6-19 years. 16 percent (over 9 million young people) are overweight.
Morbid obesity is a instruct that is described as being 100lbs or more above ideal charge or having a be crowd Index (BMI) equal to or greater than 30. Being obese alone puts one at a much greater risk of suffering from a combination of several other metabolic factors such as having high daub pressure being insulin resistant and/ or having abnormal cholesterol levels that are all related to a poor fast and a lack of exercise. The sum is greater than the parts. Each metabolic problem is a assay for other diseases separately but together they multiply the chances of life-threatening illness such as heart disease cancer diabetes and stroke etc. Up to 30.5% of our Nations adults suffer from morbid obesity and two thirds or 66% of adults are overweight measured by having a be Mass Index (BMI) greater than 25.
Considering that the U. S population is now over 290,000,000 some calculate that up to 73,000,000 Americans could benefit from some write of education awareness and/ or treatment for a pathological eating disturb or food addiction. Typically eating patterns are considered pathological problems when issues concerning weight and/ or eating habits. (e g. overeating under eating binging purging and/ or obsessing over diets and calories etc.) become the cerebrate of a persons life causing them to feel compel guilt and embarrassment with related symptoms of depression and anxiety that create significant maladaptive social and/ or occupational impairment in functioning.
We must believe that some people create dependencies on certain life-functioning activities such as eating that can be just as life threatening as medicate addiction and just as socially and psychologically damaging as alcoholism. Some do suffer from hormonal or metabolic disorders but most obese individuals simply eat more calories than they burn due to an out of control overeating Food Addiction. Hyper-obesity resulting from gross habitual overeating is considered to be more like the problems found in those ingrained personality disorders that involve loss of hold back over appetite of some kind (Orford. 1985). Binge-eating disturb episodes are characterized in move by a feeling that one cannot stop or control how much or what one is eating (DSM-IV-TR. 2000). Lienard and Vamecq (2004) undergo proposed an auto-addictive hypothesis for pathological eating disorders. They report that eating disorders are associated with abnormal levels of endorphins and share clinical similarities with psychoactive medicate abuse. The key role of endorphins has recently been demonstrated in animals with regard to certain aspects of normal pathological and experimental eating habits (food restriction combined with stress loco-motor hyperactivity). They report that the pathological management of eating disorders may lead to two extreme situations: the absence of ingestion (anorexia) and excessive ingestion (bulimia).
Addictions and other mental disorders as a rule do not develop in isolation. The National Co-morbidity Survey (NCS) that sampled the entire U. S population in 1994 open that among non-institutionalized American male and female adolescents and adults (ages 15-54) roughly 50% had a diagnosable Axis I mental disturb at some time in their lives. This surveys results indicated that 35% of males ordain at some time in their lives have abused substances to the point of qualifying for a mental disturb diagnosis and nearly 25% of women ordain undergo qualified for a serious mood disturb (mostly major depression). A significant finding of note from the NCS study was the widespread occurrence of co-morbidity among diagnosed disorders. It specifically found that 56% of the respondents with a history of at least one disorder also had two or more additional disorders. These persons with a history of three or more co-morbid disorders were estimated to be one-sixth of the U. S population or some 43 million populate (Kessler. 1994).
McGinnis and Foege. (1994) report that the most prominent contributors to mortality in the United States in 1990 were tobacco (an estimated 400,000 deaths) diet and activity patterns (300,000) alcohol (100,000) microbial agents (90,000) toxic agents (60,000) firearms (35,000) sexual behavior (30,000) go vehicles (25,000) and illicit use of drugs (20,000). Acknowledging that the leading cause of preventable morbidity and mortality was risky behavior lifestyles the U. S. Prevention Services Task compel set out to investigate behavioral counseling interventions in health care settings (Williams & Wilkins. 1996).
We have come to realize today more than any other time in history that the treatment of lifestyle diseases and addictions are often a difficult and frustrating assign for all concerned. Repeated failures be with all of the addictions change surface with utilizing the most effective treatment strategies. But why do 47% of patients treated in private treatment programs (for example) change state within the first year following treatment (Gorski,T.. 2001)? undergo addiction specialists change state conditioned to evaluate failure as the norm? There are many reasons for this poor prognosis. Some would proclaim that addictions are psychosomatically- induced and maintained in a semi-balanced compel field of driving and restraining multidimensional forces. Others would say that failures are due simply to a lack of self-motivation or will power. Most would accept that lifestyle behavioral addictions are serious health risks that deserve our attention but could it possibly be that patients with multiple addictions are being under diagnosed (with a single dependence) simply due to a lack of diagnostic tools and resources that are incapable of resolving the complexity of assessing and treating a patient with multiple addictions?
Thus far the DSM-IV-TR has not delineated a diagnosis for the complexity of multiple behavioral and substance addictions. It has reserved the Poly-substance Dependence diagnosis for a person who is repeatedly using at least three groups of substances during the same 12-month period but the criteria for this diagnosis do not involve any behavioral addiction symptoms. In the Psychological Factors Affecting Medical Conditions section (DSM-IV-TR. 2000); maladaptive health behaviors (e g. overeating unsafe sexual practices excessive alcohol and medicate use etc.) may be listed on Axis I only if they are significantly affecting the cover of treatment of a medical or mental instruct.
Since successful treatment outcomes are dependent on thorough assessments accurate diagnoses and comprehensive individualized treatment planning it is no query that repeated rehabilitation failures and low success rates are the norm instead of the exception in the addictions handle when the latest DSM-IV-TR does not even include a diagnosis for multiple addictive behavioral disorders. Treatment clinics be to undergo a treatment planning system and referral communicate that is equipped to thoroughly assess multiple addictive and mental health disorders and related treatment needs and comprehensively provide education/ awareness prevention strategy groups and/ or specific addictions treatment services for individuals diagnosed with multiple addictions. Written treatment goals and objectives should be specified for each separate addiction and dimension of an individuals life and the desired performance outcome or completion criteria should be specifically stated behaviorally based (a visible activity) and measurable.
To back up in resolving the limited DSM-IV-TRs diagnostic capability a multidimensional diagnosis of Poly-behavioral Addiction is proposed for more accurate diagnosis leading to more effective treatment planning. This diagnosis encompasses the broadest category of addictive disorders that would consider an individual manifesting a combination of substance abuse addictions and other obsessively-compulsive behavioral addictive behavioral patterns to pathological gambling religion and/ or sex / pornography etc.). Behavioral addictions are just as damaging - psychologically and socially as alcohol and medicate abuse. They are comparative to other life-style diseases such as diabetes hypertension and heart disease in their behavioral manifestations their etiologies and their resistance to treatments. They are progressive disorders that bear on obsessive thinking and compulsive behaviors. They are also characterized by a preoccupation with a continuous or periodic loss of hold back and continuous irrational behavior in arouse of adverse consequences.
Poly-behavioral addiction would be described as a express of periodic or chronic physical mental emotional cultural sexual and/ or spiritual/ religious intoxication. These various types of intoxication are produced by repeated obsessive thoughts and compulsive practices involved in pathological relationships to any mood-altering substance person organization belief system and/ or activity. The individual has an overpowering desire be or compulsion with the presence of a tendency to increase their adherence to these practices and bear witness of phenomena of tolerance abstinence and withdrawal in which there is always physical and/ or psychic dependence on the effects of this pathological relationship. In addition there is a 12 - month period in which an individual is pathologically involved with three or more behavioral and/ or substance use addictions simultaneously but the criteria are not met for dependence for any one addiction in particular (Slobodzien. J.. 2005). In essence. Poly-behavioral addiction is the synergistically integrated chronic dependence on multiple physiologically addictive substances and behaviors (e g. using/ abusing substances - nicotine alcohol. & drugs and/or acting impulsively or obsessively compulsive in regards to gambling food binging sex and/ or religion etc.) simultaneously.
The Addictions Recovery Measurement Systems (ARMS) theory is a nonlinear dynamical non-hierarchical copy that focuses on interactions between multiple risk factors and situational determinants similar to catastrophe and chaos theories in predicting and explaining addictive behaviors and relapse. Multiple influences trigger and direct within high-risk situations and affect the global multidimensional functioning of an individual. The process of change state incorporates the interaction between accent factors (e g. family history social support years of possible dependence and co-morbid psychopathology) physiological states (e g. physical withdrawal) cognitive processes (e g. self-efficacy cravings motivation the abstinence violation cause outcome expectancies) and coping skills (Brownell et al.. 1986; Marlatt & Gordon. 1985). To put it simply small changes in an individuals behavior can prove in large qualitative changes at the global level and patterns at the global level of a system emerge solely from numerous little interactions.
The ARMS hypothesis purports that there is a multidimensional synergistically negative resistance that individuals create to any one create of treatment to a single mark of their lives because the effects of an individuals addiction undergo dynamically interacted multi-dimensionally. Having the primary focus on one mark is insufficient. Traditionally addiction treatment programs undergo failed to accommodate for the multidimensional synergistically negative effects of an individual having multiple addictions. (e g nicotine alcohol and obesity etc.). Behavioral addictions interact negatively with each other and with strategies to alter overall functioning. They tend to encourage the use of tobacco alcohol and other drugs back up increase violence decrease functional capacity and promote social isolation. Most treatment theories today involve assessing other dimensions to identify dual diagnosis or co-morbidity diagnoses or to evaluate contributing factors that may compete a role in the individuals primary addiction. The ARMS theory proclaims that a multidimensional treatment plan must be devised addressing the possible multiple addictions identified for each one of an individuals life dimensions in addition to developing specific goals and objectives for each mark.
The ARMS acknowledges the complexity and unpredictable nature of lifestyle addictions following the commitment of an individual to accept assistance with changing their lifestyles. The Stages of Change model (Prochaska & DiClemente. 1984) is supported as a copy of motivation incorporating five stages of readiness to dress: pre-contemplation contemplation preparation action and maintenance. The ARMS theory supports the constructs of self-efficacy and social networking as outcome predictors of future behavior across a wide variety of lifestyle risk factors (Bandura. 1977). The Relapse Prevention cognitive-behavioral come (Marlatt. 1985) with the goal of identifying and preventing high-risk situations for relapse is also supported within the ARMS theory.
The ARMS continues to back up Twelve go Recovery Groups such as Food Addicts and Alcoholics Anonymous along with spiritual and religious recovery activities as a necessary means to keep outcome effectiveness. The beneficial effects of AA may be attributable in move to the replacement of the participant’s social communicate of drinking friends with a fellowship of AA members who can provide motivation and support for maintaining abstinence (Humphreys. K.; Mankowski. E. S. 1999) and (Morgenstern. J.; Labouvie. E.; McCrady. B. S.; Kahler. C. W.; and Frey. R. M.. 1997). In addition. AA’s come often results in the development of coping skills many of which are similar to those taught in more structured psychosocial treatment settings thereby leading to reductions in alcohol consumption (NIAAA. June 2005).
The American Society of Addiction Medicines (2003). Patient Placement Criteria for the Treatment of Substance-Related Disorders. 3rd Edition has set the standard in the field of addiction treatment for recognizing the totality of the individual in his or her life situation. This includes the internal interconnection of multiple dimensions from biomedical to spiritual as come up as external relationships of the individual to the family and larger social groups. Life-style addictions may affect many domains of an individual’s functioning and frequently demand multi-modal treatment. Real develop however requires appropriate interventions and motivating strategies for every mark of an individuals life.
The Addictions Recovery Measurement System (ARMS) has identified the following seven treatment develop areas (dimensions) in an effort to: (1) assist clinicians with identifying additional motivational techniques that can increase an individuals awareness to make progress: (2) decide within treatment progress and (3) decide after treatment outcome effectiveness:PD- 1. Abstinence/ change state: Progress DimensionPD- 2. Bio-medical/ Physical: Progress DimensionPD- 3. Mental/ Emotional: develop DimensionPD- 4. Social/ Cultural: develop DimensionPD- 5. Educational/Occupational: Progress DimensionPD- 6. Attitude/ Behavioral: Progress DimensionPD- 7. Spirituality/ Religious: Progress Dimension
Considering that addictions bear on unbalanced life-styles operating within semi-stable equilibrium compel fields the ARMS philosophy promotes that positive treatment effectiveness and successful outcomes are the result of a synergistic relationship with The Higher Power that spiritually elevates and connects an individuals multiple life functioning dimensions by reducing chaos and increasing resilience to bring an individual harmony wellness and productivity.
The Addiction Recovery Measurement System (ARMS) is proposed utilizing a multidimensional integrative assessment treatment planning treatment develop and treatment outcome measurement tracking system that facilitates rapid and accurate recognition and evaluation of an individuals comprehensive life-functioning progress dimensions. The ARMS- systematically methodically interactively. & spiritually combines the following five versatile subsystems that may be utilized individually or incorporated together:
With the end of the Cold War the threat of a world nuclear war has diminished considerably. It may be hard to create by mental act that in the end comedians may be exploiting the gratify in the fact that it wasnt nuclear warheads but French fries that annihilated the human go. On a more serious say lifestyle diseases and addictions are the leading cause of preventable morbidity and mortality yet apprise preventive behavioral assessments and counseling interventions are under-utilized in health care settings (Whitlock. 2002).
The U. S. Preventive Services assign Force concluded that effective behavioral counseling interventions that address personal health practices direct greater declare for improving overall health than many secondary preventive measures such as routine screening for early disease (USPSTF. 1996). Common health-promoting behaviors include healthy fast regular physical exercise allot alcohol/ medication use and responsible sexual practices to consider use of condoms and contraceptives.
350 national organizations and 250 State public health mental health substance abuse and environmental agencies give the U. S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy populate 2010 schedule. This national initiative recommends that primary compassionate clinicians utilize clinical preventive assessments and brief behavioral counseling for early detection prevention and treatment of lifestyle disease and addiction indicators for all patients upon every healthcare tour.
Partnerships and coordination among function providers government departments and community organizations in providing treatment programs are a necessity in addressing the multi-task solution to poly-behavioral addiction. I encourage you to support the mental health and addiction programs in America and wish that the (ARMS) resources can assist you to personally fight the War on pathological eating disorders within poly-behavioral addiction.
James Slobodzien. Psy. D.. CSAC is a Hawaii licensed psychologist and certified substance do by counselor who earned his doctorate in Clinical Psychology. The National Registry of Health Service Providers in Psychology credentials Dr. Slobodzien. He has over 20-years of mental health undergo primarily working in the fields of alcohol/ substance abuse and behavioral addictions in medical correctional and judicial settings. He is an adjunct professor of Psychology and also maintains a private learn as a mental health consultant.
ReferencesAmerican Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Fourth Edition. Text Revision. Washington. DC. American Psychiatric Association. 2000 p. 787 & p. 731. American Society of Addiction Medicines (2003). Patient Placement Criteria for the Treatment of Substance-Related Disorders. 3rd Edition,. Retrieved. June 18. 2005 from: http://www asam org/Bandura. A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral dress. Psychological Review,84. 191-215. Brownell. K. D.. Marlatt. G. A.. Lichtenstein. E.. & Wilson. G. T. (1986). Understanding and preventing change state. American Psychologist. 41. 765-782. Centers for Disease hold back and Prevention (CDC). Retrieved June 18. 2005 from: http://www cdc gov/nccdphp/dnpa/obesity/Gorski. T. (2001). Relapse Prevention In The Managed Care Environment. GORSKI-CENAPS Web Healthy People 2010. Retrieved June 20. 2005 from: http://www healthypeople gov/Publications. Retrieved June 20. 2005 from: www tgorski comLienard. J. & Vamecq. J. (2004). Presse Med. Oct 23;33(18 Suppl):33-40. Marlatt. G. A. (1985). Relapse prevention: Theoretical rationale and overview of the model. In G. A. Marlatt & J. R. Gordon (Eds.). Relapse prevention (pp. 250-280). New York: Guilford Press. McGinnis JM. Foege WH (1994). Actual causes of death in the United States. US Department of Health and Human Services. Washington. DC 20201Humphreys. K.; Mankowski. E. S.; Moos. R. H.; and Finney. J. W (1999). Do enhanced friendship networks and active coping mediate the effect of self-help groups on substance abuse? Ann Behav Med 21(1):54-60. Kessler. R. C.. McGonagle. K. A.. Zhao. S.. Nelson. C. B.. Hughes. M.. Eshleman. S.. Wittchen. H. H,-U. & Kendler. K. S. (1994). Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of DSM-III-R psychiatric disorders in the United States: Results from the national co morbidity survey. Arch. Gen. Psychiat.. 51. 8-19. Morgenstern. J.; Labouvie. E.; McCrady. B. S.; Kahler. C. W.; and Frey. R. M (1997). Affiliation with Alcoholics Anonymous after treatment: A study of its therapeutic effects and mechanisms of challenge. J Consult Clin Psychol 65(5):768-777. Orford. J. (1985). Excessive appetites: A psychological view of addiction. New York: Wiley. Prochaska. J. O.. & DiClemente. C. C. (1984). The transtheoretical approach: Crossing the boundaries of therapy. Malabar. FL: Krieger. Slobodzien. J. (2005). Poly-behavioral Addiction and the Addictions Recovery Measurement System (ARMS). Booklocker com. Inc. p. 5. Whitlock. E. P. (1996). Evaluating Primary compassionate Behavioral Counseling Interventions: An Evidence-based Approach. Am J Prev Med 2002;22(4): 267-84. Williams & Wilkins. U. S. Preventive Services Task compel. Guide to Clinical Preventive Services. 2nd ed. Alexandria. VA. U. S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010 (Conference Edition). Washington. DC: U. S. Government Printing Office; 2000. World Health Organization. (WHO). Retrieved June 18. 2005 from: http://www who int/topics/obesity/en/
According to the World Health Organization (June. 2005) obesity has reached epidemic proportions globally with more than 1 billion adults overweight - at least 300 million of them clinically obese - and is a major contributor to the global charge of chronic disease and disability. This article purports that the poor prognosis in treating patients with obesity may possibly be due to not diagnosing and treating thier other poly-behavioral addictions simultaneously. This systematic underdiagnostic standard in the handle of addictions could be due to a lack of diagnostic tools and resources that are presently incapable of resolving the complexity of assessing and treating a patient with multiple behavioral and substance abuse addictions. The Addictions Recovery Measurement System (ARMS) is proposed as a first step in fighting this global War on Poly-behavioral Addictions.
About the author: James Slobodzien. Psy. D.. CSAC is a Hawaii licensed psychologist and certified substance abuse counselor who earned his doctorate in Clinical Psychology. The National Registry of Health Service Providers in Psychology credentials Dr. Slobodzien. He has over 20-years of mental health undergo primarily working in the fields of alcohol/ substance abuse and behavioral addictions in medical correctional and judicial settings. He is an adjunct professor of Psychology and also maintains a private learn as a mental health consultant.
Related article:
http://www.smoking-cessation.findsearchall.com/smoking-cessation/pathological-eating-disorders-and-poly-behavioral-addiction/
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|