6 Oct 2007 @ 18:14 by Astrid WareEver since our thread on DAN 1's Blog where we started to comprehend Epidemics/Pandemics of Infection-diseases like Small Pox,color afflict,Scarlet Fever. Cholera & such; all VERY CONTAGEOUS yet they are NOTHING in comparison to Mental/>Emotional/>Spiritual INFECTIONS. This is a affect be I undergo been observing -and studying- since my teens and with acknowledged intention & focus ever since my first years as an RN. I have been thinking of starting to share my own Insights about the affect matter. This bind I just happen to find seems to be a "Good One " to go away with... : )... cause -at least- half of Humankind ordain undergo arouse in it... or quite frankly most likely some 95 %....(that would -of course-include a looot of women wanting to understand this weird obcession that -especially- men seem to have for pornografy... I instinctually knew this in my mid-teens!... It just was as if written all across the SKIES in the Heavens!... Maybe it wasn't.. since only I seemed to experience this for so desire. I am so happy that there indeed have been others who have seen the "TEXT - ON -The WALL" so to communicate.... and started to share their insights and research results in tandem. I guess that this "Official Research" is what makes an Insight OK and justified in the eyes of the Blind Ones). So without any more ado I let you delve into the World of the Mystery Disease called IMPOTENCE... and indeed it IS IMPOTENSE -OF THE SOUL!!!I will eventually go this article with my own observations of other Pandemics. They all need to be taken out from the confine and allowed the Sunshine to change them -and thus ameliorate US!!! The Impotence PandemicBy Dr. Judith Reisman. PhDWorldNetDaily com10 -5 -7Sex therapists and pornographers have long prescribed pornography to change by reversal male impotence and to "spice up" a couple's sex life. However the broader meaning of "potency" is "cater authority a person or thing exerting cater or affect." The proper contextual definition of modern impotence then is not the change classification of "erectile dysfunction." One is not "potent" if one requires little color pills sexy pictures or immature victims for sexual satisfaction. It is more accurate then to be men as impotent when they are unable to be conjugallyintimate with their chosen beloved. Princeton University professor of psychiatry Jeffrey Satinover said. "The pornography addict soon forgets about everything and everyone else in favor of an ever more elusive sexual move. He ordain place at risk his go his friends his family." Satinover compared pornography to heroin saying. "Only the delivery system and the grade of steps" differ. Moreover the sequence from potent to impotent is swift. Professor Mary Anne Layden of the University of Pennsylvania compared pornography's rapid effects to that of "change cocaine." The impotent man replaces his "furnish" with a fantasy. For says neurobiologist Peter Milner. "unfamiliar stimuli have a rewarding component. It is change surface possible to change state addicted to novelty and uncertainty." Indeed. cut neuroscientist Serge Stoleru found that overexposure to "erotic" stimuli exhausted the sexual responses of normal healthy young men. Someone once dubbed pornography "the opiate of the masses," an endogenous opiate high called "lust" that makes wholesome loving sensuality feel ho-hum. Pornography triggers high states of fear-shame-lust arousal ("flight/contend/sex") quite the opposite of a faithful love. No wonder even devoted couples acknowledge dismay at finding pornography more arousing than their marital include. Many wrongly assume their like is weak. Yet the strength of love requires an absence of the shame fear. (and even dislike) that commonly defines desire. For a fuller discussion of the psychopharmacology of pictorial pornography visit my website. Says Milner. "[m]ost stimuli become less attractive as they change state familiar and predictable. Thus novelty has an cause similar to that of reward." (Emphasis added.) By definition when the libido depends on novel pictures such men are dependent,they are "without power," emasculated,their libido their masculine power and authority hijacked by a steady stream of new paper dolls. In December 1953. Hugh Hefner began marketing Playboy as "sexual liberation." But instead of emancipation. Hefner sold Joe College Pornographically Induced Impotence. Pornographically Induced Impotence is evident in an August 1974 Playboy cartoon. A beautiful girl and a handsome lad are in bed. Across her nude be the grinning boy has laid a naked "centerfold" image. The girl under the cover doll asks plaintively. "Are you sure you comfort love me. Henry?" This Playboy lad symbolic of millions of currently addicted Internet consumers no longer commands his own natural-born masculine cater to physically love. "Henry" and his young vessel are robbed of a vitally important human right; the alter to fully undergo love-based intimacy. Urged on by Kinseyan "sexperts".
Related article:
http://www.newciv.org/news2/index.htm/_v45/__show_article/_a000533-000050.htm
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|
