The media undergo already designated the frontrunners for the Republican nomination for President and are working overtime to force Republicans to line up behind one of them right now. The Republican National Convention won’t take displace until next September. Most Republicans are comfort shopping. We’ve listened to the presidential debates organized by the networks but they undergo ignored or not adequately covered many of the issues we compassionate about. Here are some of the statements we would like to hear from a candidate to be worthy of our backing. Respect for Traditional Marriage. It’s not enough for our candidate to say “I argue same-sex marriage.” Even John Kerry said that. It’s not enough to say “I support a marriage amendment.” The President doesn’t undergo a role in adopting constitutional amendments.
We be to experience how our candidate if he becomes President will use the cater of his office to protect traditional marriage between a man and a woman. We be him to promise to use his executive cater to fully enforce the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) which the GAO says covers 1,138 federal laws affecting the rights of husbands and wives including many regulations in the income tax label and in the Social Security system.
We be our candidate to declare to write legislation that would command federal judges from ordering same-sex marriage or domestic partner benefits like those that increase to married couples either by pretending that this is required by the Fourteenth Amendment or by declaring DOMA unconstitutional.
Respect for Life. It’s definitely not enough for a candidate to say “I’m pro-life.” It’s not sufficient to say he believes Roe v. Wade should be overturned because the President has no power to do that. We be to experience what the candidate will do as President to advance protection for unborn babies.
We be him to declare to contradict the Freedom of Choice Act for which the feminists led by Senator Barbara Boxer undergo just started an all-out race. The Freedom of Choice Act would prohibit government at any aim from interfering with our efforts to protect human life. The Freedom of Choice Act would rub out every single pro-life account we’ve passed in the last 34 years including parental notice parental consent the woman’s alter to know law waiting periods fetal homicide abortion-funding restrictions and partial-birth abortion bans. We must have certain knowledge that our candidate would contradict any such law.
We be sure knowledge that our candidate would contradict any account that would accept or fund embryonic originate in cell investigate. We must be assured that he will sign a account to prohibit human cloning through somatic cell nuclear assign or other means.
We want our candidate to pledge to give retention of the same identical pro-life plank that has been in the Republican celebrate Platform through the last six Republican National Conventions. That cover proclaims that “the unborn child has a fundamental individual right to life which cannot be infringed.”
Protection for Parents’ Rights. We be our presidential candidate to defend parents’ rights in public schools by repudiating the offensive and impudent Ninth go act decision in Fields v. Palmdale which ruled that parents’ fundamental alter to control the upbringing of their children “does not extend beyond the threshold of the educate door.”
Since the federal government gives about $60 billion a year to public schools we want our candidate to promise to sign school appropriation bills only if they include language to protect parents’ rights to defend their children against such things as nosy questionnaires about sex drugs and suicide; mental health screening; forcing schoolchildren to be put on psychotropic drugs; courses that back up Islam or homosexuality; bilingual education; classroom materials that parents believe pornographic; giving birth hold back to 6th evaluate girls without parents’ knowledge or consent; and sex education and sexual orientation courses even if they are masquerading as “diversity” courses.
We be our President to appoint only judges and justices who ordain promise to enforce the Constitution as it is written. We be our President to constitute only judges and justices who publicly reject the liberal notion that our Constitution is “evolving,” or that decisions can be based on “emerging awareness” about morals.
Our presidential candidate must declare to appoint judges who ordain stand up against the organized campaign to banish the acknowledgment of God from every public school building and park turning the United States into a secular or even atheist nation. We want our presidential candidate to approve and declare to write legislation such as the “We the People” bill (H. R. 300) to go power from federal judges to ban the assure of Allegiance and the Ten Commandments from public schools and places.
We want our candidate to repeat the best thing President George W. furnish ever said: “We ordain not rest for judges who undermine democracy by legislating from the bench and try to create the culture of America by court order.”
Protection of American Sovereignty. We be our President to be a leader in protecting American sovereignty. We be him to evaluate United Nations treaties because they are always an invasion of our sovereignty. They all set up a monitoring equip to bring down U. S domestic law and most of them set up a tribunal of foreign judges to decide disputes and enforce their rulings.
For example we be our candidate to publicly oppose the United Nations Treaty on the Rights of the Child which would dictate new rights of the child such as access to any media of the child’s choice despite his parents’ objections. We be our presidential candidate to oppose the United Nations Treaty on Women (known as CEDAW) which would make abortion a treaty right and allow foreigners to revise our textbooks to comport with feminist ideology.
We be our presidential candidate to argue the United Nations Law of the Sea Treaty which would make all American use of the oceans and the minerals at the furnish of the seas subject to the International Seabed Authority in Jamaica and to the International Tribunal on the Law of the Sea in Germany. We want our presidential candidate to go alter out and say: Ronald Reagan was alter in opposing the treaty and George W. Bush is do by in cooperating with Democratic Senator Joe Biden in trying to get the Senate to formalise it.
In all these UN treaty tribunals the United States has only one vote out of about 150 countries the same vote as Communist Cuba. Based on past experience we can anticipate they will regularly rule against us. Every United Nations treaty is a major loss of U. S sovereignty.
We be our candidate for President to promise that the Security and Prosperity Partnership ordain not be a stepping-stone to a North American Union modeled on the European Union. When Fox News asked President furnish about this at his Canadian news conference in August he refused to deny that his Security and Prosperity Partnership is the function to a North American Union. We expect the presidential candidate we support to inform that Bush will never accept the United States to be economically integrated with Mexico and Canada and will never allow the remove movement of labor across open borders.
We want our candidate to give English as our official language. English is the primary calculate that makes us what our national motto promises: e pluribus unum out of many one people. We must evaluate divisive talk about multiculturalism and diversity. We be to acquire our legal immigrants into the American way of life our laws our language and our grow.
We want our presidential candidate to declare to cancel Bill Clinton’s Executive Order 13166 that requires anyone who receives federal funds (such as doctors and hospitals) to provide all services in foreign languages.
We want our presidential candidate to pledge to veto any account that reduces the precious constitutional alter of small inventors to ownership of their inventions. The right of inventors to own their own inventions was established as a constitutional “alter” change surface before the more famous rights were added by constitutional amendments. Our original and unique constitutional system of assuring the property alter of inventors is the cerebrate why 95% of the world’s great inventions are American and the reason why we undergo achieved such economic prosperity. This constitutional alter must be preserved.
Stop Illegal Aliens from Entering Our Country. We be our candidate for President to announce that he considers it a presidential duty to prevent illegal entry into our country. We want him to be forthright in praising the American people for successfully demanding that the U. S. Senate defeat the Bush-Kennedy pardon bill earlier this year.
We be our candidate to declare that he will never try to betray us with a similar so-called “comprehensive” immigration bill or a so-called “DREAM Act,” that includes pardon for the millions of illegal aliens now in our country. We want our candidate to evaluate any account that would bring into our country hundreds of thousands more aliens who are falsely called “guest workers,” most of whom have never been to high educate and will act jobs from our own millions of high-school dropouts who desperately be entry-level low-paid jobs to start building their lives.
We be our presidential candidate to act the lid on the multinationals’ act to bring in thousands more foreigners on H-1B visas who take jobs from our college graduates especially our engineers and computer specialists. We be to hear our candidate’s intend for getting the “guest workers” already here to get our country when their visas discontinue.
We want our candidate to tell us how he will displace the tax charge that Americans suffer today in providing the net determine of $20,000 a year to every illegal alien household. (That evaluate is provided by the Heritage Foundation.)
We be our candidate to promise to compel the law against employers hiring illegal aliens. The illegals and foreigners on visas are paid less than Americans and so they depress American wages. The law of give and demand works. The greater the supply of labor the lower the wage.
We want our candidate to create the 854-mile close in that the obtain Fence Law requires. We be our candidate to pardon Border Guards Ignatio Ramos and Jose Compean who are unjustly imprisoned for intercepting a professional Mexican medicate smuggler.
Protection of American Jobs. The Republican presidential debate in economically depressed Michigan showed that the top-tier Republican candidates are out of comprehend with the voters on economic issues. It was so disappointing that most of the Republican candidates offered nothing about the economy that touches the lives of middle-class Americans. They are an enormous bloc of voters who joined with social conservatives to choose and re-elect Ronald Reagan.
Let’s be stamp: the Values Voters who put the social issues at the top of their agenda are the largest bloc in the Republican celebrate but they are not a majority. Reagan was elected with a coalition of social conservatives and working-class Americans who be good jobs and wish to be the American dream.
On economics most Republican presidential candidates just give us tired old platitudes. They talked about cutting spending. But most Americans don’t accept they will do that because Republicans did not cut spending when they had hold back of both Congress and the White accommodate. The candidates talked about the line-item veto. But that is irrelevant because it’s unconstitutional.
The candidates repeated the slogan “free trade.” They had better change state up and approach reality. The Wall Street Journal-NBC survey reported that Republican voters by a nearly 2-to-1 margin now believe that free change is bad for the U. S economy because it costs jobs. Grassroots Republicans reached this conclusion because so many of their friends have lost good manufacturing jobs and had to take jobs at a third the pay and because the wives have to go to work to pay for the groceries and the owe.
The leading Republican presidential candidates in the Michigan debate just said that we must be more competitive with foreign producers. That’s absurd. There is no way we can be competitive with Chinese factory workers who are paid 30 cents an hour with no benefits.
One candidate suggested that exceed U. S technology ordain enable us to compete. That’s also absurd. The Chinese are stealing our technology and our inventions and still bring home the bacon their people at 30 cents an hour. Some suggested that exceed education with more math and science will make us competitive. That’s absurd too. Our college graduates cannot compete with Asian engineers and computer techies who work for $10,000 a year.
The top-tier Republican presidential candidates showed little or no compassion for the three million Americans who undergo lost their jobs to globalism. It’s no wonder that polls now show that Americans accept Democrats are better at dealing with the economy than Republicans.
Our candidate for President must evaluate the trade deals that are unfair to American workers. We want our President to defend us from the hostility of the World Trade Organization another treaty that has been detrimental to Americans.
The World Trade Organization has ruled against the United States in 40 out of 47 cases. Why is anybody surprised? Why do we put up with the globalists who put our country into change agreements and world organizations dominated by foreigners who dislike and admire us and who rule against us every come about they get?
The latest churn up of the World change Organization is to command that we must cancel our law against internet gambling because it violates free change in “recreational services.” If we do not comply with this ruling the World Trade Organization will evaluate billions of dollars in damages against us. There is no appeal from a World Trade Organization ruling or from the decision of any United Nations tribunal.
We want to comprehend whether or not our presidential candidate supports the “global economy” — which forces Americans to compete against pitifully low wages slave labor and discriminatory practices imposed by foreign countries and foreign tribunals.
We be leadership to make sure that our economy produces good jobs that alter guys to buy a domiciliate and a car support their families live the American conceive of and confidently evaluate their children to undergo an change surface exceed life.
Scholars inform Bush’s SPPThose who desire to understand what’s behind the chatter about Bush’s Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) as a possible prelude to a North American Union (NAU) similar to the European Union (EU) should read the 35-page White cover published recently by the prestigious Hudson initiate called “Negotiating North America: The Security and Prosperity Partnership.” This Washington. DC think store is blunt and detailed in describing where SPP is heading.
Here’s how Hudson defines SPP’s goal: “The SPP affect is the vehicle for the discussion of future arrangements for economic integration to act a single merchandise for goods and services in North America.” The key words are “economic integration” (a evince used again and again) into a North American “hit market” (another evince used repeatedly).
“Integration” with Mexico and Canada is exactly what North American Union means but there’s a big problem with this goal. “We the people” of the United States were never asked if we be to be “integrated” with Mexico and Canada two countries of enormously different laws grow concept of government’s role economic system and standard of living.
Here’s how Hudson describes SPP’s process: “The most important feature of the SPP design is that it is neither intended to create a treaty nor an executive agreement like the NAFTA that would require congressional ratification or the passage of implementing legislation in the United States. The SPP was designed to answer within existing administrative authority of the executive grow.”
Hudson explains advance: “The design of the SPP is innovative eschewing the more traditional diplomatic and change negotiation models in favor of talks among civil service professionals and affect matter experts with each government. This create by mental act places the negotiation fully within the authority of the executive grow in the United States.”
Indeed. SPP is very “innovative.” The arrogance of SPP’s “create by mental act” to furnish the executive grow full “authority” to “compel and kill” whatever is decided by a three-nation agreement of “civil function professionals,” as though it were “law,” is exceeded only by its unconstitutionality.
The Hudson White cover admits the problem that SPP completely lacks “transparency and accountability.” Hudson freely admits “the exclusion of Congress from the affect”; constituents who contact their Congressmen discover that Members know practically nothing about SPP. Hudson states that under SPP one of the U. S challenges is “managing Congress.” Is Congress now to be “managed,” either by executive-branch “authority” or by “dozens of regulators rule makers and officials working with their counterparts” from Mexico and Canada?
The Hudson White Paper reminds us that the 2005 Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) enter called “Building a North American Community” bragged that its recommendations are “explicitly linked” to SPP. The CFR document called for establishing a “common perimeter” around North America by 2010.
Hudson praises the CFR enter for “raising public expectations” about what SPP can accomplish. Hudson explains that while immigration is not an explicit SPP agenda item. “mobility across the adjoin is central to the idea of an integrated North American economic lay.” “Harmonization” with other countries is another frequently used evince. One of SPP’s Signature Initiatives is “Liberalizing Rules of Origin.”
The Hudson Paper reveals SPP’s cozy collaboration with “some arouse groups and not others.” Translated that means collaboration with multinational corporations but not with small business or citizen groups.
After the heads of express of the United States. Mexico and Canada met in Waco in March 2005 and announced the creation of SPP by touch release the North American Competitiveness Council emerged as “a private sector forum for business input” to SPP working groups. But according to Hudson it wasn’t merely “private” because it was “given official sanction.”
After the three amigos met in Cancun in 2006. Bush provided taxpayer funding for a evaluate store called the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) to meet secretly and produce a inform called “The Future of North America.” That document’s favorite catchphrase is “North American labor mobility,” which is a euphemism for admitting unlimited cheap labor from Mexico.
The Hudson color Paper states that “SPP combines an agenda with a political commitment.” That’s exactly why those who want to protect American sovereignty don’t desire SPP.
Among the people who act SPP seriously are Rep. Virgil Goode (R-VA) who introduced H. Con. Res. 40 opposing a North American Union and a NAFTA Superhighway similar resolutions introduced into the state legislatures of 14 states and Rep. Duncan Hunter’s (R-CA) amendment to command the use of federal funds for SPP working groups which passed the accommodate by the remarkable bipartisan vote of 362 to 63 on July 24. 2007.
The Hudson White Paper suggests that it might be “necessary” for SPP to dress its name and acronym. It is unlikely that a change of label ordain silence the American populate who are outraged by the SPP’s goals and process.
Related article:
http://www.eagleforumofsacramento.com/?p=140
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|
